CHILDREN'S HEALTH ARTICLES

 

Harvard Study: Strong Link Between Fluoridated Water and Bone Cancer in Boys
Department Chair With Industry Ties Misrepresented Results to Federal Authorities

For Immediate Release: April 05, 2006
Contact: EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982


(WASHINGTON, April 5) — Boys who drink water with levels of fluoride considered safe by federal guidelines are five times more likely to have a rare bone cancer than boys who drink unfluoridated water, according to a study by Harvard University scientists published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The study, led by Dr. Elise Bassin and published online today in Cancer Causes and Control, the official journal of the Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention, found a strong link between fluoridated drinking water and osteocarcoma, a rare and often fatal bone cancer, in boys. The study confirms studies by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the New Jersey health department that also found increased rates of bone cancer in boys who drank fluoridated tap water.

Bassin's study comes on the heels of a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report that found the federal "safe" limit for fluoride in tap water did not protect children from dental fluorosis or increased bone fractures. The NAS recommended that the allowable limit for fluoride in tap water be lowered immediately.

"This study raises very serious concerns about fluoride's safety and its potential to cause bone cancer in teenage boys," said Richard Wiles, EWG's senior vice president. "The findings raise fundamental questions about the wisdom of adding fluoride to tap water."

The Bassin study is also at the center of a joint federal and Harvard ethics investigation into whether Dr. Chester Douglass—the chairman of Oral Health Policy and epidemiology at Harvard Dental School and Bassin's doctoral thesis advisor—lied about the results of her work when reporting the results of his federally funded research to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

Last year, Environmental Working Group (EWG) obtained documents strongly suggesting that Douglass may have misrepresented Bassin's findings. Douglass has received large federal grants to study the relationship between fluoridated drinking water and bone cancer, and is on the payroll of Colgate, the toothpaste giant, where he has edited their dentists' newsletter for more than a decade.

When pressed recently by an investigative reporter from Fox News in Boston as to the quality of Bassin's findings, Douglass had nothing but praise for the work. "She did a good job. She had a good group of people advising her. And it's a nice—it's a nice analysis. There's nothing wrong with that analysis," he said.

"It's nice to see that Dr. Douglass has finally come clean on the quality of Dr. Bassin's work. It's just a shame that he was not so forthcoming when reporting on his work to the NIH," Wiles said.

Fox filmed Dr. Douglass waving a draft copy of Harvard's investigation of his conduct, and saying the university's report will be coming out soon. Last year, EWG asked the NIEHS, which funded Douglass' research, to investigate whether he misrepresented his findings.

EWG urges communities not to add fluoride to tap water, and advises parents to avoid fluoridated water for their children, particularly bottle fed infants. "Fluoride is fine in toothpaste, where it is directly applied to the teeth, but provides almost no dental benefit in water, while presenting serious health risks, particularly for boys," Wiles said.

Source:  Environmental Working Group is a nonprofit research organization based in Washington, D.C., that uses the power of information to protect human health and the environment. The group's work on fluoride is available at http://www.ewg.org/issues/siteindex/issues.php?issueid=5031.

 

back to top^

 

OP Pesticides in Children's Bodies: The Effects of a Conventional versus Organic Diet 

Conventional agriculture includes the use of pesticides to control insects in vegetable, fruit, wheat, and other crops, so it's no surprise that foods derived from these crops can therefore contain pesticide residues. What's in question, though, is what these exposures amount to in terms of body burden. Risk-defining data are lacking, and scant data exist on diet-derived pesticides levels in children's bodies. Now researchers from Seattle and Atlanta characterize the relationship between eating a diet of conventionally grown food products and the amount of organophosphorus (OP) pesticide residues that make it into children's bodies [EHP 114: 260-263].

No beef here. A study of organophosphate metabolites in children eating an alternating conventional/organic/conventional diet shows that eating organic plant-derived foods really can reduce pesticide exposure.

According to a 1993 National Research Council report titled Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children, diet delivers the bulk of children's exposure to pesticides. This exposure poses a greater health risk to children as compared to adults, because not only do children consume more food on a per-weight basis than adults and consequently have higher exposure, they also may be more vulnerable to the effects of toxicants because they are still developing.

The researchers employed a longitudinal design in which 23 children aged 3 to 11 years accustomed to eating a conventional diet switched to organic foods and back again during a 15-day study period. For the first three days, the children consumed their regular conventional diets. During the next five days, they substituted organic equivalents of their usual plant-derived food items (including fresh produce, juice, processed fruits and vegetables, and grain-based products). For the last seven days, they resumed their conventional diets. Each day, for the entire 15-day period, parents collected a urine sample in the morning when the children woke and again at bedtime.

The urine samples were analyzed for metabolites of several OP pesticides. The most commonly detected metabolites were MDA (a metabolite of malathion) and TCPY (a metabolite of chlorpyrifos). During both conventional phases, 60% of samples contained MDA, and 78% of samples contained TCPY. When children switched to organic foods, the percentage of samples containing MDA dropped to 22% and the proportion with TCPY fell to 50%.

Average concentrations of MDA and TCPY also were significantly lower during the organic phase compared to the conventional phases. During the two conventional phases, mean urinary MDA concentrations were 2.9 and 4.4 micrograms per liter (µg/L) compared with 0.3 µg/L in the organic phase. The mean TCPY level decreased from 7.2 to 1.7 µg/L between the first and second phases, and rose to 5.8 µg/L when the children resumed their conventional diets.

Metabolite levels varied widely among the samples, however. Recent research suggests that fractions of MDA and TCPY form as the parent compounds degrade in foods and the environment. Therefore, some proportion of the children's exposure may have been to the metabolites themselves in the foods.

The current study provides insight into how residual OP pesticides in food correspond with the absorbed dose, and the researchers conclude that a diet of organic foods protects children from exposure. They caution against applying results to the general population, however. Given that people from different backgrounds and living in different areas may have different and more significant OP exposures, it would be a mistake to assume that switching to an organic diet would eliminate all exposure to these pesticides. The study does support the National Research Council's conclusion that dietary intake is a major source of OP pesticide exposure, but some children may receive even more exposure from the use of pesticides in the home, and further research is needed.

Julia R. Barrett
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/114-2/ss.html



  THE ORGANIC BABY & TODDLER COOKBOOK     

THE ORGANIC BABY & TODDLER COOKBOOK
by Maxted-Frost, Tanyia
£6.95

An easy-to-follow nutrition guide for babies from weaning to toddlerhood.  It includes the basic principles of good nutrition for mother and baby, information on why to eat organic, seasonal meal planners, recipes for meals and juices, tips on how to adapt the meals into the family routine, the ideal lunchbox, and more.

click on BOOK to BUY or to view other organic books



 

back to top^


Children and Additives: Adding Up to No Good?

The safety of food additives is usually examined by varying the dose of a single additive administered to animal models or cell cultures. However, British researchers at the University of Liverpool and the University of Ulster report in the March 2006 issue of Toxicological Sciences that combinations of additives can produce neurotoxic effects at dosages that are safe when each additive is tested alone.

Food blues? Certain food additives including common dyes may combine to cause toxic effects.
 
The authors examined four common food additives: Quinoline Yellow (FD&C Yellow No. 10), Brilliant Blue (FD&C Blue No. 1), L-glutamate (the major constituent of monosodium glutamate, or MSG), and aspartame. Quinoline Yellow is banned from foods in the United States, Japan, and Norway; Brilliant Blue was banned from foods in most European countries but has since been reapproved. Coauthor Karen Lau, a doctoral student, says these additives were tested because they are commonly used in foods targeted for consumption by children.

Neurotoxicity was measured by the relative growth of neurites from mouse NB2a neuroblastoma cells after exposure to the additives. Two combinations of additives stunted neurite growth: Quinoline Yellow paired with aspartame, and Brilliant Blue paired with L-glutamatic acid. Other pairings showed no effect. Lau hypothesizes that ingestion of the well-established neurotoxicants aspartic acid and L-glutamic acid as additives could lead to a high enough body burden to kill neurons by a mechanism called excitotoxicity.

Lau says young children may be especially at risk for the type of toxicity observed in the nerve-cell cultures, because effects were seen at concentrations of additives she says are theoretically achievable in plasma by eating foods and drinks typically consumed by children--for example, a snack of corn chips, which may contain MSG, and a fruit juice drink, which may contain aspartame.

Scientists at the U.K. Food Standards Agency (FSA) question whether these results are relevant to the human consumption of these additives. "[The Lau study assumes] that both MSG and aspartame are absorbed one hundred percent in the gut, but [other studies] show that this does not seem to be the case," says FSA senior press officer Shaun Whelan. "It is . . . extremely unlikely that the plasma levels predicted by the authors of this study accurately reflect the actual situations in vivo."

Whelan says glutamic acid and aspartic acid occur naturally in many foods, and there is no evidence that they are treated differently in the body when they are ingested as food additives. Lau counters, however, that consumption of glutamic acid in its free form or as MSG has a more dramatic effect on plasma levels than that of glutamatic acid in protein, and can lead to high concentrations in the body. More research is needed to clarify these effects.

Other studies have suggested that non-nutritive food additives are associated with behavioral disorders such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. These effects are controversial, but Lau's team believes their results warrant further investigation of such possibilities. Whelan says the FSA is currently funding research on the effects of ingested chemical mixtures, including color additives, on the behavior of young children.

Michael Szpir
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/114-4/forum.html#beat

back to top^

 

Optimum Nutrition For Your Child's Mind
by Patrick Holford


Maximise your child's potential
If you want to maximise your child’s potential you need to feed them the best brain food. Whether it's their first toddle on the kitchen floor or, their sudden plunge into emotions and relationships as teenagers all depends on how well their brains are working. And that in turn depends, in large part on how well their brain is nourished.

Below outlines an easy to follow five-point plan to help you balance your child’s mood and improve their concentration both at school and at play.

1.Take your child off foods with additives or added sugar

Sugar creates imbalances in energy that can contribute to erratic behaviour, hyperactivity and mood changes. Sweets, chocolates, cakes, biscuits, some breakfast cereals, soft drinks, puddings and many other foods all contain sugar in one of its many forms. When checking labels, avoid foods that contain sucrose, glucose, malt, dextrose, inverted sugar syrup, golden syrup, corn syrup and honey. Also check for additives – artificial colourings, sweeteners, preservatives and flavourings can all contribute to adverse behaviour, particularly the orange colouring tartrazine (E102) found in some orange squashes and sweets, mono-sodium glutamate (MSG) and caffeine. It’s better to avoid giving your child processed foods and instead opt for natural, sugar-free alternatives.


2. Increase fruit, veg and foods rich in vitamins and minerals

Rather than letting your child fill up on junk food, give them whole, nutritious food to eat. White bread, rice and pasta have the nutrients stripped out, so opt instead for wholemeal varieties, which are also more filling and contain fibre to encourage healthy digestion.
Ensure too their diet is rich in fresh fruit and vegetables which provide vitamins and minerals essential for building a strong healthy body. Some children may be reluctant to swap the sweets for an apple, but if you hold firm, often their sweet tooth will recede. Also use your imagination to make fresh food more exciting – tempt them with bite-size snacks of cherry tomatoes, berries or grapes, bake apples or pears with cinnamon and serve with creamy Greek yoghurt, cut vegetables into fun shapes to eat with dips, or puree and ‘disguise’ in sauces and soups.
For children who are used to a diet of processed food such as chicken nuggets or fish fingers, it may help to switch across first to a home made equivalent such as chicken strips and fish cakes and then gradually introduce more vegetables into the mix e.g. fish and broccoli cakes etc. That way their taste buds gradually adjust to natural vegetable flavours.


3. Boost levels of essential fats

Some types of  fats called trans fats found in processed foods should be avoided. These are hydrogenated fats and are typically found in packaged foods with a long sell by date.  However, there are other fats that are essential and a deficiency could negatively impact on your child’s behaviour. For example, the brain and nervous system needs a good supply of special essential fats called omega 6 and omega 3 to function and develop effectively. To ensure your child gets enough of these fats give them the following:

Oily fish i.e. salmon, mackerel, tuna (preferably fresh not tinned tuna as there’s more omega 3 in fresh) 3 times a week;

AND

A heaped tablespoon of freshly-ground seeds on their cereal or sprinkled on soups or in salads every day. The magic formula is mix half pumpkin, sunflower and sesame with half linseeds, store in a glass jar in the fridge then grind fresh in a coffee grinder before serving.

AND

Supplement essential fats. This could either be a fish oil (which contains omega 3 fats) or a seed oil (which contains a blend of omega 3 and omega 6 fats). These are available as liquids or capsules from health food shops. Try Essential Omegas (with both omega 3 and 6 oils) or, for young children who can’t swallow, Smart Fish. It tastes great.


4. Supplement the diet

It’s hard to get all the nutrients we need from our diet, so to be sure your child is not deficient, supplement their diet with a good-quality daily multivitamin and mineral such as the Optimum Nutrition Formula. Small children who cannot swallow may prefer multivits which are chewable, such as Dinochews.


5. Eliminate allergens from the diet

If you suspect your child is intolerant to a particular food – for example, you notice they react badly after eating the [same thing] certain foods, or they seem to crave a particular food – eliminate it from their diet and monitor the reaction. If after two weeks you see no difference in behaviour/symptoms, reintroduce it and see if there’s a reaction. If not, then try a different suspected food group until you find what’s bothering them (or find that food’s not in fact the problem). The most common  foods that cause problems are wheat, gluten (the protein found in wheat, barley and rye and a slightly less allergenic version in oats), dairy foods and eggs. Your can test your child for food intolerance using Yorktest’s Home Test Kit . They also test for ‘homocysteine’, a test that can determine if your child might benefit from additional B vitamins.

Some ideas for healthy eating:

Breakfast – Avoid sugary cereals and opt for oat based cereals such as porridge (sweetened with grated apple) or museli, fresh fruit smoothies (fruit blended with yoghurt and seeds or  milk and Get Up & Go) poached or boiled egg with wholemeal soldiers, or kippers.

Lunch – a sandwich made with wholemeal bread with a tasty filling (e.g. tuna, egg, cheese, humous, salad), hunks of cheese, cherry tomatoes, vegetable sticks, a slice of quiche for packed lunches; jacket potatoes, soups, scrambled or poached eggs or salads at home.

Supper – It is important to make sure there is some element of protein in every meal - fresh (not processed) meat, fish or vegetable protein (soya, beans or lentils) with fresh vegetables, wholemeal spaghetti with a fresh tomato sauce, chilli with brown rice or fresh vegetable risotto. If your child eats a very limited range of vegetables find something new that they like and introduce it in small quantities.

For healthy snacks – fresh fruit (for faddy eaters it often helps to cut fruit into bit size pieces and place on the table in front of them - they will gradually eat it without noticing!), oat cakes or wholegrain bread with peanut butter, almonds and pumpkin seeds, oat cakes or carrot sticks with humous, or Nairns oat biscuits or homemade flapjacks sweetened with dried fruit or honey.

Source:  www.patrickholford.com




  THE ORGANIC BABY & TODDLER COOKBOOK     

THE ORGANIC BABY & TODDLER COOKBOOK
by Maxted-Frost, Tanyia
£6.95

An easy-to-follow nutrition guide for babies from weaning to toddlerhood.  It includes the basic principles of good nutrition for mother and baby, information on why to eat organic, seasonal meal planners, recipes for meals and juices, tips on how to adapt the meals into the family routine, the ideal lunchbox, and more.

click on BOOK to BUY or to view other organic books


back to top^

 

Babies In Womb Exposed To 'Gender-Bending' Chemicals
By Emily Cook Last updated at 22:58pm on 10th September 2006
DAILY MAIL
 
Babies are being exposed to "gender-bending" chemical pesticides before they are even born, disturbing new evidence has showed.  Tests on blood taken from the placentas of pregnant women revealed up to fifteen different types of pesticide, the research found.

Worryingly, the chemicals were found in every single one of the 308 women tested. The findings will fuel concern about the chemicals, known as hormone disruptors or EDCs - endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

High levels of exposure have been linked to reproductive abnormalities - so-called gender-bending - because they upset the hormonal development of the embryo. The effects are already being seen in nature where some species of fish and animals with deformed sex organs have been found.

Scientists blame agricultural pesticides and other hazardous chemicals such as those found in flame retardants which have leaked into the environment.

Last year a similar report by WWF-UK and Greenpeace found that babies are being exposed to a whole array of chemicals at the most vulnerable point in their development. Tests on the blood of 30 newborn babies found the presence of eight different groups of chemicals, ranging from cleaning products to chemicals used to make plastics and non-stick waterproof coatings.

A study led by scientists at the University of Rochester in New York also found that common chemicals found in thousands of household products such as soaps and make-up can harm the development of unborn baby boys. The results reinforce calls for pregnant women to be especially careful about their diet and for the reduction of chemicals in food production.

The latest findings were made by the Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine at the University of Granada in Spain. Analysis of the placentas revealed the "presence of seventeen endocrine disruptive organochlorine pesticides" - the so-called gender benders. Some patients' placentas contained 15 of the 17 pesticides tested for.

Maria Jose Lopez Espinosa, who headed the research, feared that the chemicals could cause health problems for children who suffered exposure in the womb. She said: "The results are alarming: 100 per cent of these pregnant women had at least one pesticide in their placenta but the average rate amounts to eight different kinds of chemical substances." She warned, "We do not really know the consequences of exposure to pesticides in children but we can predict that they may have serious effects since this placenta exposure occurs at key moments on the embryo's development."

The modern, chemical-laden environment can be especially harmful to pregnant women. During the gestation period, contaminants which accumulate in fatty tissues, access the unborn child via the blood supply and the placenta.

The Spanish research was carried out at San Cecilio University Hospital among 308 women who had given birth between 2000 and 2002. Tests were performed on 668 samples. The study also found a higher presence of pesticides in older mothers and those who had a higher Body Mass Index.

Miss Espinosa believed that a healthy lifestyle with plenty of exercise, good food and no smoking would help combat the effect of "inadvertent exposure" to the chemicals. She added, "It is possible to control pesticide ingestion by means of a proper diet, which should be healthy and balanced, through consumption of food whose chemical content is low. "Moreover, daily exercise and the avoidance of tobacco, which could also be a source of inadvertent exposure, are very important habits which help to control the presence of pesticides in our bodies".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.htmlin_article_id=404522&in_page_id=1774&in_a_source=



      


BUY SAFE PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS
 

High quality organic personal care products for all the family certified to food grade standards.

100% harmful synthetic chemical free!

Safe for mother & baby

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT MORE




back to top^

 

Hundreds of Toxic Chemicals Measured in Newborn Babies
Study Finds Industrial Pollution Begins in the Womb
27/07/2005

WASHINGTON — Not long ago, scientists believed that babies in the womb were largely protected from most toxic chemicals. A new study helps confirm an opposite view: that chemical exposure begins in the womb, as hundreds of industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides are pumped back and forth from mother to baby through umbilical cord blood.

Environmental Working Group (EWG) commissioned laboratory tests of 10 American Red Cross cord blood samples for the most extensive array of industrial chemicals, pesticides and other pollutants ever studied. The group found that the babies averaged 200 contaminants in their blood. The pollutants included mercury, fire retardants, pesticides and the Teflon chemical PFOA. In total, the babies' blood had 287 chemicals, including 209 never before detected in cord blood.

The blood samples came from babies born in U.S. hospitals in August and September of 2004. The study, called Body Burden: The Pollution in Newborns, tested each sample of umbilical cord blood for an unprecedented 413 industrial and consumer product chemicals. The study (www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/) is part of an important new science that measures toxins in people — the human body burden.

"For years scientists have studied pollution in the air, water, land and in our food. Recently they've investigated its health impacts on adults. Now we find this pollution is reaching babies during vital stages of development," said EWG Vice President for Research Jane Houlihan. "These findings raise questions about the gaps in our federal safety net. Instead of rubber-stamping almost every new chemical that industry invents, we've got to strengthen and modernize the laws that are supposed to protect Americans from pollutants."

U.S. industries manufacture and import approximately 75,000 chemicals, 3,000 of them at over a million pounds per year. Yet health officials do not know how many of these chemicals pollute fetal blood and what the health consequences of in utero exposures might be. Many of these chemicals require specialized techniques to detect. Chemical manufacturers are not required to make available to the public or government health officials methods to detect their chemicals in humans, and most do not volunteer them.

EWG's Houlihan said that had her group been able to test for more chemicals, it would almost certainly have detected them.

http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/  


      


BUY SAFE PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS
 

High quality organic personal care products for all the family certified to food grade standards.

100% harmful synthetic chemical free!

Safe for mother & baby

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT MORE




back to top^

 

Cleaning Products Can Harm Your Children
 
The symptoms of persistent wheezing in young children may be linked to cleaning products they were exposed to while in the womb. Research showed that 10 percent of the children born into families who used cleaning products such as bleach and carpet cleaners were twice as likely to battle wheezing problems than those who were exposed to cleaning products the least.

A study involving almost 14,000 children was conducted to find out if there was a link between prenatal exposure to cleaning supplies and wheezing.

The 10 Most Common Cleaning Disinfectants Used by Pregnant Women

  • Bleach
  • Carpet Cleaner
  • Dry Cleaning Fluid
  • Aerosols
  • Turpentine/White Spirit
  • Air Fresheners
  • Paint Stripper
  • Paint or Varnish
  • Pesticide/Insecticides
  • Window Cleaner
     

The children in the study were followed until they reached 3-and-a-half years of age. Results from the study revealed that the babies who were exposed to these chemicals most frequently were more likely to develop persistent wheezing as young children. The relationship between exposure to the cleaning products and wheezing was the same despite environmental factors such as parental smoking, damp housing and family history of asthma.

Although these findings haven't confirmed that these chemicals have caused an increase in the number of asthma cases, one expert stated there was growing evidence that environmental exposure at an early age might contribute to the development of asthma.

Other experts view this study as a reminder to pay closer attention to the indoor air quality we breathe as it might play a big factor in the health of children's lungs.

BBC News December 23, 2004



THE ORGANIC BABY BOOK     

THE ORGANIC BABY BOOK
by Maxted-Frost, Tanyia
£7.95

The Organic Baby Book was the first popular guide to going organic for conceiving and raising a healthy child, and the first to review all organic products for babies, pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and young families. This second edition is updated with many new products, home delivery companies and useful websites.

click on BOOK to BUY or to view other organic books


 

back to top^

 

© Copyright Organic Essences. Organic Skin Care & Natural Skin Remedies.

Click here to receive a 25% discount from SiteWizard

SiteWizard.co.uk Web Site Design Company : eCommerce Software Shopping Cart Solutions